Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
3) Agreement on the conditions of resumption of work in the factories.
"We still hold hope that the Oct. 3 agreement will be implemented smoothly if all countries participating in the six-party talks make sincere efforts based on the principle of action for action," the statement said.
The median defined disagreement between the experts when it was between 1 and 3, agreement between 7 and 9, and indecision between 4 and 6.
We assess the accuracy of parcellations from four different aspects: (1) reproducibility across different acquisitions and groups, (2) fidelity to the underlying connectivity data, (3) agreement with fMRI task activation, myelin maps, and cytoarchitectural areas, and (4) network analysis.
Table 3 Agreement between the two operators in both the groups Group Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r s ) P value A 0.864 0.001* B 0.986 0.000*P*P < 0.05 = significant Fig. 8 Agreement plot for the first and second operators.
All observations were made by visual interpretation with interobserver (N = 3) agreement of 100%.
Similar(41)
Fleiss' κ values were interpreted according to the criteria defined by Landis and Koch 23: −1.00, total disagreement; 0.00, no agreement; 0.01 0.20, slight agreement; 0.21 0.40, fair agreement; 0.41 0.60 moderate agreement; 0.61 0.80 substantial agreement; 0.81 0.99 almost perfect agreement and 1.00, perfect agreement.
Agreement rating: κ = 0 no agreement; 0.01 to 0.2 slight agreement; 0.21 to 0.40 fair agreement; 0.41 to 0.60 moderate agreement; 0.61 to 0.80 good agreement; and 0.81 to 1 excellent agreement.
The following ranges were considered for interpretation of the kappa coefficients [ 36]: poor agreement, <0.00; slight agreement, 0.00-0.20; fagreementment, 0.21-0.40; moderagreementment, 0.41-0.60; substagreementreement, 0.61-0.80; almost perfect agreement, 0.81-1.00.
An interpretation by Landis and Koch [ 14] divided kappa into six categories: < 0 (no agreement), 0.0 0.20 (very low agreement), 0.21 0.40 (low agreement), 0.41 0.60 (moderate agreement), 0.61 0.80 (full agreement) and 0.81 1.00 (almost perfect agreement).
The kappa values were interpreted as follows: <0, no agreement; 0 0.19, poor agreement; 0.20 0.39, fair agreement; 0.40 0.59, moderate agreement; 0.60 0.79, substantial agreement; 0.80 1.00, almost perfect agreement [ 13].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com