Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
In particular, we hypothesize that Mode 2 sciences have a higher use of Internet applications and address a greater variety of audiences with a greater variety of research outputs than Mode 1 sciences.
For a categorical predictor, this indicated the difference in odds between the current and reference categories (e.g. the odds of Passes All Courses with exposure to Any 2 Sciences, relative to the odds of not having exposure to Any 2 Sciences).
The odds of passing all eight courses was 2.3 times higher for those students who had exposure to Any 2 Sciences versus those students who did not (CI: 1.15-4.61; p = 0.019) (Table 8).
As shown in Table 8, all predictors had a statistically significant effect on First Year Tertiary GPA, with the most significant predictor being NCEA Rank Score, then MAPAS Advice Followed, Any 2 Sciences and MAPAS Mathematics Test results.
N for any 2 sciences differs from Rank Score as it does not exclude CIE, IB, International, or alternative admission students d FC Few concerns, SMC Some or major concerns ^ L3 subject missing data includes those NCEA applicants who did not enrol in that particular subject *Adjusted for MAPAS interview year, gender, ancestry and school decile.
Admission variables that showed significant single predictive effect (i.e. MAPAS Maths Test, NCEA Rank Score, Any 2 Sciences and Followed MAPAS Advice) were included in the multiple regression analyses to determine their joint effects on the academic outcomes of interest (Tables 8 and 9).
Similar(51)
Our investigation focuses on two key DMIP 2 science questions.
As a third covariate the scientific discipline was included in the meta-regression analysis: (1) economics/law, (2) natural sciences, (3) medical sciences, or (4) social sciences.
3) Science!
E1 OBITUARIES A21 SCIENCE TIMES F1-12 Defiance or Incompetence?
Related Times Articles References Academic Content Standards: Grades 6-8 StandardStandard 16- Understands the scientific enterprise.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com