Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Three feeders and 2 forage types were used in a 3 × 2 factorial treatment arrangement within a Latin-square design to evaluate forage feeding waste.
Treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial design; 2 forage particle lengths (FPL) of alfalfa silage (short and long) were combined with low (35:65) and high (60 40) forage-to-concentrate ratio (F C; dry matter basis).
Treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial design; 2 forage particle lengths (FPL) of alfalfa silage (short and long) were combined with low (35:65) and high (60 40) forage:concentrate (F C) ratios (dry matter basis).
Treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial design; 2 forage particle lengths (FPL) of alfalfa silage (short and long) were combined with low (35:65) and high (60 40) forage:concentrate (F C) ratios [dry matter (DM) basis].
Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate interactions of a sugar source (molasses) with monensin and 2 forage sources on rumen fermentation, total tract digestibility, and production and fatty acid composition of milk.
We developed a spatially explicit decision model using multi-objective optimization to assess juniper management strategies for (1) sage-grouse habitat restoration and (2) forage production for cattle.
Similar(54)
For all rats, the first session involved 2 foraging trials with the maze in the standard configuration.
Starch supplementation depressed (P<0.01) forage OM and NDF intakes.
Experimental diets were: (1) high forage (HF); (2) medium high forage (MHF); (3) medium low forage (MLF); (4) low forage (LF), and contained 60 40, 45:55, 30:70 and 15:85 forage:concentrate ratios, respectively.
All cows received a basal diet formulated with a 56:44 forage:concentrate ratio.
Main factors were type of diet (i.e., 100 forage and 900 concentrate versus 600 forage and 400 concentrate) and the addition of BEO (i.e., 0 mg/l versus 1.5 mg/l of BEO).
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com