Suggestions(1)
Exact(15)
Factor 2 assesses trust in intuition, tolerance to negative affect and tolerance to adversity, and is made up of seven items (for example: "I see the funny side of things"), with scores ranging from 0 to 28.
A key difference between Experiments 1 and 2 is that Experiment 1 also assesses the benefit of hierarchical and progressive alignment, whereas Experiment 2 assesses structural alignment and corrective feedback alone, without progressive or hierarchical alignment, in an effort to devise a more time-efficient means of intervention.
Study 2 assesses the construct validity of the SVS by testing the scale's convergent validity.
Aim 2 assesses whether the 5As communication training intervention improves patients' perceived competence for physical activity.
Model 2 assesses the roles of behavioral factors as potential mediators or confounders of the relationship between social engagement and CV risk factors.
Component 3 in table 2 assesses how the committee evaluated the various considerations of health needs, effectiveness, resources and values when making its final recommendations.
Similar(44)
Step 2: Assess your internal candidates.
Parts 1 and 2 assessed inhibitory control.
Feature 2: assess using picture recognition or random letter test.
Parts 1 and 2 assess selective attention, and part 3 assesses selective attention with some demand for shifting.
Section 2 assessed work stress.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com