Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(18)
2) Agreement on a continuing campaign to unify baseball with specific goals and objectives.
The Arab League has called an emergency meeting in Cairo for Saturday to discuss Syria's failure to comply with the Nov. 2 agreement.
Fig. 2 Agreement between different delirium assessment methods and the neurological experts' reference rating using the DSM-5 criteria.
Figure 2 Agreement and association between balance (balance post-exsang. ) and CT performed after exsanguination (CT post-exsang. ) for measuring lung weight.
The criteria for study eligibility were as follows: 1) patients with a probable or probably headache diagnosis in the HEREIN study, and 2) agreement to participate in the study.
Table 2 Agreement between RENEX and consensus for each rating category Category Regression coefficient, δa (SE) p value* Non-obstructed (δ 1) 1.57 (0.30) < 0.0001 Equivocal (δ 2) -0.28 (0.31) 0.37 Obstructed (δ 3) 1.82 (0.36) < 0.0001 * p < 0.05 indicates there is a significant beyond-chance agreement between RENEX and consensus readings in the corresponding category.
Similar(42)
Fleiss' κ values were interpreted according to the criteria defined by Landis and Koch 23: −1.00, total disagreement; 0.00, no agreement; 0.01 0.20, slight agreement; 0.21 0.40, fair agreement; 0.41 0.60 moderate agreement; 0.61 0.80 substantial agreement; 0.81 0.99 almost perfect agreement and 1.00, perfect agreement.
Agreement rating: κ = 0 no agreement; 0.01 to 0.2 slight agreement; 0.21 to 0.40 fair agreement; 0.41 to 0.60 moderate agreement; 0.61 to 0.80 good agreement; and 0.81 to 1 excellent agreement.
The following ranges were considered for interpretation of the kappa coefficients [ 36]: poor agreement, <0.00; slight agreement, 0.00-0.20; fagreementment, 0.21-0.40; moderagreementment, 0.41-0.60; substagreementreement, 0.61-0.80; almost perfect agreement, 0.81-1.00.
An interpretation by Landis and Koch [ 14] divided kappa into six categories: < 0 (no agreement), 0.0 0.20 (very low agreement), 0.21 0.40 (low agreement), 0.41 0.60 (moderate agreement), 0.61 0.80 (full agreement) and 0.81 1.00 (almost perfect agreement).
The kappa values were interpreted as follows: <0, no agreement; 0 0.19, poor agreement; 0.20 0.39, fair agreement; 0.40 0.59, moderate agreement; 0.60 0.79, substantial agreement; 0.80 1.00, almost perfect agreement [ 13].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com