Exact(1)
From day 92 onwards, the reactor gradually lost its EBPR performance with complete loss of P removal performance after 7 days, i.e. 1 sludge age.
Similar(59)
Of the remaining 120 patients, 13 had sludge, 11 had a dilated common bile duct, one had a positive sonographic Murphy sign, and 95 had no abnormalities.
Musically they were steeped in the 70s sludge rock of Led Zeppelin and (primarily) Black Sabbath, leavened with the then-obligatory twist of insurrectionary post-punk attitude.
With an increase in MLSS concentration (from 2.3 to 16 mg L−1) or in conductivity (from 20 to 60 mS cm−1), sludge settling was significantly worse.
Although results show better filtration efficiency for activated sludge (e.g. SS removal around 98.4%) than for septage (e.g. SS removal around 87.5%), the feasibility of septage treatment with SDRB has been demonstrated with, at 50 kg SS m−2 y−1 sludge accumulation, and dry matter about 7.9 cm y−1 and 70% (summer period), respectively.
Under operating conditions with 12 16 h hydraulic retention time and 8000 16 000 mg l−1 sludge concentration in the bioreactor, COD removal efficiency was above 98% for 900 1600 mg l−1 influent COD and nitrification above 95% with 50 600 mg l−1 total nitrogen fed to the membrane bioreactor.
Additionally, sludge from D5 showed decreased toxicity after digestion in opposite to digested D6 sludge demonstrating increased toxicity.
Mixture A: 1/3 sludge + date palm tree waste 2/3, total volume: 4 m3.
Mixture B: 1/2 sludge + date palm tree waste 1/2, total volume: 4 m3.
Two trials with different proportions of mixed sewage sludge/palm waste were run: Mixture A: 1/3 sludge + date palm tree waste 2/3, total volume: 4 Mixtureure B: 1/2 sludge + date palm tree waste 1/2, total volume: 4 m3.
Table 1 Biogas and methane yield Reactor Substrate OLR (g VS/L/day) CH4 Gas production (ml/day at 37°C) Specific gas production (ml methane/g VS at 0°C) D4 Oat 6 51 17,500 300 D5 Oat + sludge 3 + 3 53 14,000 270 D6 sludge 3 63 4,000 180.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com