Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
Need related factors were assessed in terms of "How do you perceive your general health status"?, "How do you consider the present condition of your mouth and teeth with categories (1) good, (0) bad and "Are you satisfied with the appearance of your teeth with categories (1) satisfied, (0) dissatisfied.
If there exist concave function φ : R+ → R+, φ (0) = 0 and real function ϕ : R+ → R, ϕ (t) < 1, ∀t > 1 satisfied (5), the conclusions of Theorem 2.3 also hold.
If there exist convex function φ : R+ → R+, φ(0) = 0 and real function ϕ : R+ → R, ϕ (t) > 1, ∀t > 1 satisfied (1), the conclusions of Theorem 2.1 also hold.
The split common fixed point problem (SCFPP) is to find a point x ∗ ∈ H 1 satisfied with x ∗ ∈ ⋂ i = 1 p Fix ( U i ), A x ∗ ∈ ⋂ j = 1 r Fix ( T j ), where U i : H 1 → H 1 ( i = 1, 2, …, p ) and T j : H 2 → H 2 ( j = 1, 2, …, r ) are nonlinear operators.
All affected probands but 1 satisfied NF1 diagnostic criteria.
Satisfaction scale: "very satisfied" (coded as 1), "satisfied" (2), "neutral" (3), "unsatisfied" (4), "very unsatisfied" (5).
Similar(48)
Use this scale: 7: Very satisfied; 6: Moderately satisfied; 5: Slightly satisfied; 4: Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 3: Slightly dissatisfied; 2: Moderately dissatisfied; 1: Very dissatisfied.
With the new scoring method, job satisfaction fell into 5 categories: "extremely dissatisfied" (adjSS: 10-29), "dissatisfied" (30-49), "generally satisfied or not" (50-59), "satisfied" (70-89), and "extremely satisfied" (90-100).
Patients can rate their satisfaction on a 5-point Likert-scale with answering categories unsatisfied (=1), somewhat satisfied (=2), rather satisfied (=3), quite satisfied (=4) and very satisfied (=5).
It contains seven alternative responses: 1) Very satisfied; 2) Fairly satisfied; 3) Satisfied; 4) So-so; 5) Dissatisfied; 6) Fairly dissatisfied; 7) Very dissatisfied [ 37].
There were more distinct perceptions in T3; satisfied (51.5%), very satisfied (27.3%), neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (12.1%), and dissatisfied (9.1%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com