Sentence examples for 1 reader from inspiring English sources

Table 1 Reader operation restrictions versus d   = Freq ≠ Freq = Time d > dRR d > dRT ≠ Time d > 0 d > 0.

In the student-level regression model, the probabilities in Equations 1a, 1b, and 1c that Student i in School j falls into Category 1 (reader with high proficiency), 2 (reader with low proficiency), or 3 (the reference category, i.e., an average reader) are ϕ1ij, ϕ2ij, and ϕ3ij, respectively.

Cross-sectional radiographic data are presented for each reader (reader 1, reader 2) and the mean for both readers at baseline, 6 and 12 months.

The smears were scored by 1 reader according to the guidelines of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (8 ).

However, none of the 3 readers considered Gadovist to be superior for lesion delineation and only 1 reader noted minimally significant preference for Gadovist for the definition of lesion internal structure.

This test has a number of limitations including (1) reader variability; (2) false-positive test results due to cross-reactivity with environmental non-tuberculous mycobacteria and BCG; (3) false-negative test results due to anergy in immunosuppressed individuals; and (4) inconvenience to patients as they are required to return to get the test read [ 2].

The predicted probability for the combined assessment of T2W-MRI + ADC derived from the logistic regression rendered an AUC of 0.91 for reader 1 and 0.96 for reader 2. The optimal predicted probability was 0.51 for reader 1 and 0.69 for reader 2, which resulted in a sensitivity of 56%, specificity 98%, PPV 83% and NPV 92% for reader 1.

We illustrate these problems through examples in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 Reader-Tag Collision Problem: responses of a tag to a reader when queried are drowned out by the interfering signal from another concurrently operating reader in the vicinity.

The AUC for detection of metastatic nodes was 0.88 for reader 1 and 0.95 for reader 2. Sensitivity was 65%, specificity 93%, PPV 61% and NPV 94% for reader 1.

13 4 THE OFFICIAL FAHRENHEIT 9/11 READER, by Michael Moore.

During the time frame, letters totaled less than half of the reader input – 118 letters out of 308 reader contributions.