Exact(15)
See Appendix 7.1 Proof of Lemma 1, Proposition 1. □.
37. Book 1, Proposition 4, Corollary 7, which was added in the second edition.
It is quite straightforward to prove the following Corollary 1, Proposition 1, and Proposition 2.
Consequently, a more relaxed matching like that of (CC_{rg}(C,D_i)) will always be 1 (Proposition 0.3).
Theorem 1, Proposition 1, and Theorem 4 play a fundamental role in our specification of the robust fundamental value.
(1) Proposition 2.1 ii) and (iii) guarantee that (T^{(i)}) defined by (1) satisfies the firm nonexpansivity condition.
Similar(45)
Lemma 3.1 (see [1, Proposition ]).
Meanwhile, (A1) implies that [1, proposition 4.1].
Lemma 2.2 ({Kamimura and Takahashi [4], [1, Proposition 2.1]}).
By a proof in a standard way ([1], Proposition 3.11), we can get the next lemma.
Proposition 7.1 (See also [[1], Proposition 9.1] for the bounded case).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com