Suggestions(5)
Exact(38)
On a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent), how would you rate the current menu, service and dining room experience?
–Weighing all the above factors, assign a value to this site's interactivity on a scale of 1 (poor) to 6 (excellent).
–Weighing all the above factors, assign a value to this site's functionality on a scale of 1 (poor) to 6 (excellent).
If not, why not? –Weighing all the above factors, assign a value to this site's visual design on a scale of 1 (poor) to 6 (excellent).
–Weighing all the above factors, assign a value to this site's content on a scale of 1 (poor) to 6 (excellent).
–Weighing all the above factors, assign a value to this site's structure and navigation on a scale of 1 (poor) to 6 (excellent).
Similar(22)
1 Poor-quality research can result in wasted efforts of investigators, participants and funders.
WICKET Sehwag 5-1 c Tikolo b Odoyo 3 (5-1) Poor shot selection from Sehwag sees him edge a simple catch to Tikolo.
In the effort to create a vaccine for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), poor immune response to the HIV proteins is a fundamental problem.
Responses are provided on a 4-point scale: 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Excellent.
The PBE instrument was modified to a five-point Likert-type scale using 1 = poor, 2 = below average, 3 = average, 4 = above average, and 5 = exemplary as anchors.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com