Exact(16)
Two studies used paired analysis (repeated measures of analysis of variance [ANOVA], n = 1; paired t test, n = 1) to evaluate test-retest reliability [ 16, 33].
Specifically, processing strategies were compared using (1) paired analysis of the nine optimal tumor-normal pairs; (2) non-paired analysis of the nine tumors using HapMap normals as the reference set; and (3) the reference signal generated by the Virtual Normal algorithm from the nine tumor samples with the HapMap normals as a baseline.
Experiment 1 paired a distinct context with footshocks, to examine food intake in food-deprived rats upon re-exposure to the context.
Notably, t-values were first computed for the PLVs related to all electrodes of helmet 1 paired one by one with all electrodes of helmet 2. Following previous studies [41], [42], the resulting t-value matrices were then thresholded for absolute values larger than 2. Selected pairs of electrodes were then clustered according to a neighborhood criterion adapted to PLVs between two helmets.
Three CNS PNETs were recurrences, 1 paired, plus 1 second surgery sample.
Thus, comparison of block 2 with block 1 (paired t tests p <.0013) is suggestive of some learning in all groups.
Similar(43)
Paired Student's t-tests were used to compare the expression in 1 1 paired normal and WT samples.
This study using 1 1 paired case-control design included 409 suicide attempters and 409 paired controls matched on age, gender and place of residence.
20 paired phospho-signaling effectors were evaluated.
Whilst subjects in the experimental group showed a significantly lower preference on day-2 compared with day-1 (paired t-test: t9 = 2.256, P = 0.05), subjects in the social control group showed a higher preference on day-2 compared with day-1 (paired t-test: t8 = −2.429, P = 0.04).
Based on the different binding behaviors, the band at 10 300 cm–1 (paired with 4500 cm 1) reflects 5C iron site, and the band at 8400 cm 1 reflects another 5C iron site.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com