Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
Table 1 Summary of the models used for precipitation variable No. Country of run Model name Run Precipitation 1 Norway Bccr-bcm2.0 1 √ 2 Canada Cccma_cgcm3_1 1 √ 3 USA Giss_model_e_r 1 √ 4 Russia Inmcm3_0 1 √ 5 France Ipsl_cm4 3 √ 6 Germany Echam-5 3 √.
The respondents were from 11 European countries (Denmark, 2; Finland, 1; France, 1; Germany, 2; Hungary, 1; Ireland, 1; Italy, 3; The Netherlands, 1; Norway, 1; Spain, 10; UK, 1).
OR; odds ratio; CI; confidence interval; OR per standard-deviation increase for continuous variables Age; Origin; country of birth, divided into three groups, 1) Norway, 2) other TB low- endemic countries, 3) TB endemic countries; Stay in TB endemic country; stayed and/or worked in TB endemic country (>2 weeks).
The remaining European countries and companies represented include: Austria (1), Belgium (1), Denmark (3), Estonia (2), Finland (5), France (3), Israel (2), Lithuania (1), Luxembourg (1), Norway (1), Spain (5), Sweden (1), and Switzerland (6).
(Researcher 1, Norway).
We identified patients and obtained treatment details from 12 cancer centres (11 United Kingdom, 1 Norway) and ascertained second cancers and mortality through national registries.
Similar(52)
Five of the sampling sites were the same as those used to produce the DNA libraries previous to SNP detection: C858 (Canada), S856 (Shetland), I852 (Ireland), N849 (Northern Norway), and N813 (South Norway) [ 39].
In addition, genotypes were also obtained from seven sites also described in previous reports [ 39]; N854 (South Norway), N837 (North Norway), F850 and F851 (Faeroe Islands), S855 (Shetland), I853 (Ireland), C857 (Canada),.
Minus 110 and plus 200 gave Norway 3 imps and victory by 8 imps, 182-174.
We used 3 longitudinal studies (n=31 060 suicides) with monthly suicide and meteorological data from Greece (1992 2001), Victoria, Australia (1990 1998) and Norway (1969 2009).
Shots on goal: Canada 30, Norway 15. 18 A flood of penalties.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com