Sentence examples for 1 maf from inspiring English sources

All the SNPs were filtered with the criteria: (1) MAF (minor allele frequency) ≥ 0.05; (2) Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test P value ≥ 0.05.

SNPs were excluded when 1) MAF < 0.01; 2) Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) test P-value < 0.0001; 3) SNPs call rate < 95%.

We predicted that 1) MAF would be negatively associated with deleteriousness only for derived alleles, and 2) the derived allele frequency (DAF) would better predict phenotypic effects of SNPs.

Because of the relationships between MAF, MGF and Hobs MAF = x+ ½ Hobs, where 0 ≤ x≤ 1; MAF ≥ MGF × 1.5), FPs are also significantly influenced by MAF and MGF with 0.16 ≤ ρ ≤ 0.28 for categorical-uniform and binary traits.

The industrial ponds represent only 1 maf (1.2 km) of the associated water storage but account for 80% of the net electricity generation from ponds, whereas the multipurpose ponds/reservoirs represent 3.4 maf (4.2 km) of water storage but only 20% of the net electricity generation.

For a SNP A/a, the minor allele frequency was calculated by the following formula (1) MAF = min 2 N AA + N Aa, 2 N aa + N Aa 2 N AA + 2 N aa + N Aa Where N aa represents the count of individuals who are homozygous for allele1, N Aa represents the count of individuals who are heterozygous, N aa represents the count of individuals who are homozygous for allele2.

When comparing the diverse diploid reference panel to random panels, the mean rank across all 50 data sets is 147.9 for all heterozygote sites, 188.0 for sites with 0 < MAF < 0.1, 163.9 for sites with 0.1 ≤ MAF < 0.2, and 145.9 for sites with 0.2 ≤ MAF ≤ 0.5.

Step 2: MAF transformation: Transform (Yleft( x right)) into uncorrelated MAF factors (Mleft( x right)); Mleft( x right) = {user2{A}}^{text{T}} left( {Yleft( x right)} right) (2).

After filtering noise levels were reduced to (15.7 ± 4.1)% (MAF) and (18.9 ± 3.7)% (BF) in the liver and to (20.1 ± 4.1)% (MAF) and (17.8 ± 3.7)% (BF) in the lung, i.e. with the chosen filter parameters both filters reduced the noise by about a factor of two in comparison to the original data.

In 1928, the Boulder Canyon Project Act provided for a fixed volume sharing among the lower basin States: Arizona received 2,8 Maf, California 4,4 Maf and Nevada, 0,3 Maf.

The rs2239751 MAF was low (0.8%) and homozygous carriers were not found (Table 1).