Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
As shown in Table 1, GSP was high galactose-containing sulfated polysaccharides.
Similar(59)
The buccal face of the tooth is markedly slanted unlike in TF 6223, Sivapithecus sivalensis (GSP 9564, GSP 15000, GSP 16082), Lufengpithecus lufengensis (PA 548, PA 848, PA 580, PA 895) and L. keyuanensis (pl. 1 in [31]).
Fig. 9 GSP output example.
Correspondingly, we define Gpp ≐ |Hpp|2, Gps ≐ |Hps|2, Gsp ≐ |Hsp|2 and Gss ≐ |Hss|2 which are denoted channel gains in the following.
We analyzed different algorithms for sequence mining, such as AprioriSOME and AprioriAll [36], GSP [37], WAP [41], and PLWAP [42].
Based on the Apriori algorithm [6], GSP starts by collecting the applications whose frequency is higher than a minimal support threshold, to create the length-1 frequent sequence set.
GSP rules for the applications sequence Table 4 GSP input data example Mon [9 11] Application sequences 1st week Excel, Mozilla, Spotify, 2048, VLC 2nd week Excel, Mozilla, Word, CALC, VLC 3rd week Notepad, Mozilla, Word, 2048, VLC 4th week Mozilla, Word, Spotify, 2048, VLC.
(Color figure online) Table 1 Test retest reliability (ICC) for each measure and dataset, for the cortical ribbon data Measure Study 1 CCBD Study 2 GSP Thickness (CT .816.890 Gyrification (GI .945.941 Fractal dimensionality Dilation filled (FD f ).842.936 Dilation surface.845.936 Boxcount filled.799.879 Boxcount surface.769.849 SPHARM surface.977.982 SPHARM refers to spherical harmonics.
The only relationships among the hinb/hina/gsp markers in the DAGGER graph are that marker 3_0984 hinb) is distal to markers 3_0975(gsp), 3_0979 hina), and 3_0977(gsp).
MergeMap shows the markers 3_0976(gsp), 3_0978 hina), 3_0980 hina), and 2_0226 hina) as mapping distal to both hinb markers, and the marker 3_0975(gsp) is shown distal to 3_0979 hina).
The 5′ RACE was done using Invitrogen kit (USA) with the help of the following gene-specific primers: GSP R1 (5′-GATCTCCGAGAATTTCCTCTTC-3′), GSP R2 (5′-ACCGAACCTAGCGTGAGCTTTGA-3′) and GSP R3 (5′-GGCACGATGTTCAACTTCCGGTG-3′).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com