Suggestions(5)
Exact(16)
Taking (m=0) in Theorem 1, Corollary 2 follows.
Letting n = 1, Corollary 3.6 reduces to Corollary 3.5.
(1) Corollary 2.2, in part, is a generalization of Theorem 3.9 and Theorem 3.15 of [13].
Remark 5 For | a | < 1, Corollary 3.4 is the same as Theorem 3.1 of Hu [1].
Using Theorem 1, Corollary 1 can be easily demonstrated (refer to [26] for the proof).
For a = b = 1 and n = 1, Corollary 4.8 yields the main theorem in [17].
Similar(44)
Consequently, S + R has SVEP at 0 [[1], Corollary 2.26].
The following lemma is cited from [1], Corollary 4.7.
When (p=1), Corollary 1 is reduced to Corollary 4.2 in [1].
This extends the result of [[1], Corollary 4.5] to the case p ≠ q.
If (b=1), Corollary 3.7 recovers the Dass-Gupta fixed point theorem [18].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com