Exact(8)
Animals were divided into four groups: 1) CON, N = 17; 2) HS, N = 18; 3) CON locusts treated with 10−5 M ouabain (CON-OUA), N = 10; 4) HS locusts treated with 10−5 M ouabain (HS-OUA), N = 8.
Dietary treatments included 1) CON (basal diet), 2) WGM1 (basal diet + 1% wild ginseng adventitious root meal) and 3) WGM2 (basal diet + 2% wild ginseng adventitious root meal).
Dietary treatments included: 1) CON (basal diet), 2) H1 (CON + H. cordata extract powder 1 g/kg) and 3) T1 (CON + T. officinale extract powder 1 g/kg).
Forty adult female Wistar rats were assigned randomly into five groups: (1) Con; (2) Met; (3) OVX + Met; (4) OVX + Met + α-ZAL; (5) OVX + Met + 17β-E2 (17β-estradiol).
Dietary treatments were: 1) CON (basal control diet), 2) BLBM-10 (BLBM replaced 10% crude protein in soybean meal), 3) BLBM-25 (BLBM replaced 25% crude protein in soybean meal), and 4) BLBM-50 (BLBM replaced 50% crude protein in soybean meal).
Leading up to the episode's broadcast, showrunner Damon Lindelof asked in an interview, "Until now, Sawyer's been the No. 1 con man on the island.
Similar(52)
The number of patients included in specific analysis were as follows: MCD 20 vs. CON 36 – 58 vs. 53; MCD 40 vs. CON 54 – 55 vs. 47; MCD 40 vs. CON 18 – 55 vs. 57; and MCD 60 vs. CON 36 – 49 vs. 53.
This works even for non-list pair structures: (cons 1 (cons 2 3)) is displayed as (1 2. 3).
To estimate the density effect, for each exclosure type seeds were placed at either high density (corresponding to natural density: 24 seeds/m2, 12 con- and 12 hetero- specific) or low density (2 seeds/m2, 1 con- and 1 heterospecific) [30].
Thus, the following 3 Con-anc mutants were prepared: (1) Con-anc-N/C, in which the N- and C-termini were substituted with the corresponding residues of ConI; (2) Con-anc-L5, in which the L5 region was substituted with the corresponding sequence of ConI; and (3) Con-anc-N/C/L5, which had mutations of both Con-anc-N/C and Con-anc-L5.
Lesson VI-1: Con Jobs The Eskimos have twenty-seven different words you can use to sell them snow.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com