Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Attitude (20% of the variance) included three statements: 1) "CFS as not a big problem as media suggests" 2) "People with CFS are just depressed" 3) and, "If people with CFS rest they will get better".
Evaluation of the PSG led us to exclude 10 subjects with clinically significant sleep abnormalities: 3 controls with RDIs of 26, 22.4, and 18/hour, 1 CFS patient with an RDI of 22.1/hour, 1 CFS/FM patient with an RDI of more than 40/hour, and 1 control, 3 CFS patients, and 1 CFS/FM patient with PLMs.
As shown in Figure 1, CFS of E. faecium KQ 2.6 could exert inhibiting activity to the growth of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli.
Belief (19% of the variance) included 2 items based on comparisons to other illnesses: 1) "CFS more difficult to treat and manage" 2) and, "CFS more difficult to diagnose".
We included 1 CFS patient and 3 healthy controls with RDIs of 10.4, 10.8, 10.1, and 9.5/hour, respectively, as these fall within the range seen in asymptomatic normal subjects in the study by Ayappa and colleagues [ 20].
The sample selection of core trainers has two limitations as participants were selected in part because of: 1) CFS interest, and 2) ability or opportunity to secure secondary teaching opportunities.
Similar(53)
Procedure 1: CF procedure.
Cf classes Cf and Cd terminologies Cd classes 1 Cf < 1 Low Cf indicating low contamination/low Cd Cd < 8 2 1 ≤ Cf < 3 Moderate Cf/moderate Cd 8 ≤ Cd < 16 3 3 ≤ Cf < 6 Considerable Cf/Cd 16 ≤ Cd < 32 4 Cf ≥ 6 Very high Cf/Cd Cd ≥ 32 Source: Hakanson (1980) Table 7 Modified degree of contamination classification and their description S.n.
projection of steering vectors on R ̂ − 1 (cf. Equation 14). .
The scaling variable that goes with it is ν ( x, f ) = f + CF 1 CF ( x ) + CF 1. (7).
Samples CF #1, CF #2, CF #4, CF #5, and CF #6 were noticeably brighter than the authentic tablets, while CF #3 was visibly darker.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com