For Virtex-5 best case 5-stages pipeline, throughput is 170.2 Mpixels/s and slice is 1858.
MISD is the geometric mean of the seven sub-metrics, which were directed toward sustainability, and rescaled (normalized) 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case).
In Figure 5 it can be seen that the probability that AVD is cost-effective is 0.07 (worst case), 0.36 (base Case) and 0.75 (best case) when considering a WTP threshold of €40,000.
In these scenario analyses a strong variation of the cost-effectiveness results was obtained ranging from €23,512 (best case) to €176,958 (worst case) per QALY gained by AVD therapy.
Looking at a WTP threshold of €60,000 and €80,000 the probability that AVD is cost-effective is 0.22 and 0.31 (worst case), 0.53 and 0.63 (base case) and 0.85 and 0.89 (best case), respectively.
In these analyses a strong variation of the cost-effectiveness results was obtained ranging from €23,512 (best case; RR 100%; AVD first year costs €55,000) to €176,958 (worst case, RR 25%; €115,000) per QALY gained by AVD therapy.
In conclusion I appeal to the FAO to at least publish a statement in support of the IPCC AR5 best case emissions scenario RCP 2.6. . .
To investigate the implication of missing data of DI, we performed best/worst case scenario sensitivity analyses by assigning the value 0 (best case) and the maximum values for the sub-cohorts (worst case) of the diagnostic intervals.
If we apply a classic EUT threshold [ 13, 14, 36], which relies solely on system II processes, we observe that the probability of pulmonary embolism above which the physician should administer anticoagulants ranges from 1.6% = 1 / 1 + 60.8 (best case) to 22.2% 1 / 1 + 3.5 (worst case scenario).
Secondary analysis was to test the difference in LOS reported in the accelerated intervention group in the RCT by Larsen et al. [ 19] ("best case") with LOS obtained in the fully implemented procedures in the postimplementation period ("real case"), to see whether effectiveness could match efficacy.
In this unprecedented situation, threatening billions of people today and the future of humanity, the relevant and involved United Nations Departments are obligated to explain the emergency and certainly to simply (while most significantly) recommend the IPCC AR5 best case emissions scenario RCP 2.6.
