Exact(9)
Among the subjects with migraine with aura n = 29 had visual, n = 12 sensory, n = 4 aphasic, n = 2 motor and n = 1 auditory aura.
We applied auditory BF for three reasons: (1) auditory feedback is preferable for motor learning [20], (2) visual and haptic feedback tends to interfere with the bat swing and other information, and (3) auditory BF would be an optimal method for instructing temporal sequence (e.g., melody road [21]) especially when swinging a bat.
We monitored fixation during Experiment 2 (visual new signals) but not in Experiment 1 (auditory new signal) since the display did not include visual elements other than those used for the task that might attract gaze.
The experimental battery is schematized in Fig. 1; auditory stimulus characteristics are summarized in Table 2, further methodological details and sound examples are in the online Supplementary material.
The following tasks from the Comprehensive Aphasia Test were analysed: (1) Auditory sentence comprehension: participants were read a sentence and asked to point to one of four pictures which best fitted the sentence.
When, in Experiment 1, auditory nontargets were slightly shifted in time relative to the visual targets they were paired with, their influence on visual duration discrimination performance significantly decreased.
Similar(51)
The ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of eccentricities (F3, 18 = 5.87, p<.01) and auditory conditions (F2, 12 = 19.54, p<.001).
Adaptation experiments have been applied both in the visual [16] and auditory system [3], [17], [18], [19].
AV, visual with simultaneous auditory; V50A, visual with auditory delayed by 50 ms; V100A, visual with auditory delayed by 100 ms; V150A, visual with auditory delayed by 150 ms; A50V, auditory with visual delayed by 50 ms; A100V, auditory with visual delayed by 100 ms; A150V, auditory with visual delayed by 150 ms.
For the RF, 12 auditory channels are sufficient to achieve the best error rate.
Seven databases obtained from 25 auditory tests are available for our study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com