Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
President Bush said he retained confidence in George J. Tenet, a day after the director of central intelligence took responsibility for approving the use of unsubstantiated information about Iraq's nuclear program. 1 Agreement on Iraqi Council Iraqi factions agreed after tense negotiations on a list of 25 people to establish the country's first postwar government.
Fig. 1 Agreement between VAE and LRTI diagnostic.
Figure 1 Agreement and association between balance (balancepost-exsang). and CT performed in living animals (CT in vivo ) for measuring lung weight.
To determine (1) agreement of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) findings of shoulder pathology and related shoulder special test results in individuals with varied durations of manual wheelchair (MWC) use after spinal cord injury (SCI); and (2) whether shoulder musculoskeletal impairments, per MSK-US and clinical examination, differed in individuals with SCI and varying durations of MWC use.
Informally, a protocol that solves the consensus problem must fulfill the following properties:1 Agreement: If peers P i, P j are correct, then v i =v j Termination: The protocol terminates in a finite number of steps Validity: If all correct peers have the same input value (tilde v), then all correct peers decide on (tilde v).
(Statements as in Figure 1, agreement data available online).
Similar(44)
Fleiss' κ values were interpreted according to the criteria defined by Landis and Koch 23: −1.00, total disagreement; 0.00, no agreement; 0.01 0.20, slight agreement; 0.21 0.40, fair agreement; 0.41 0.60 moderate agreement; 0.61 0.80 substantial agreement; 0.81 0.99 almost perfect agreement and 1.00, perfect agreement.
Agreement rating: κ = 0 no agreement; 0.01 to 0.2 slight agreement; 0.21 to 0.40 fair agreement; 0.41 to 0.60 moderate agreement; 0.61 to 0.80 good agreement; and 0.81 to 1 excellent agreement.
The following ranges were considered for interpretation of the kappa coefficients [ 36]: poor agreement, <0.00; slight agreement, 0.00-0.20; fagreementment, 0.21-0.40; moderagreementment, 0.41-0.60; substagreementreement, 0.61-0.80; almost perfect agreement, 0.81-1.00.
An interpretation by Landis and Koch [ 14] divided kappa into six categories: < 0 (no agreement), 0.0 0.20 (very low agreement), 0.21 0.40 (low agreement), 0.41 0.60 (moderate agreement), 0.61 0.80 (full agreement) and 0.81 1.00 (almost perfect agreement).
The kappa values were interpreted as follows: <0, no agreement; 0 0.19, poor agreement; 0.20 0.39, fair agreement; 0.40 0.59, moderate agreement; 0.60 0.79, substantial agreement; 0.80 1.00, almost perfect agreement [ 13].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com