Sentence examples for 1 aco from inspiring English sources
A novel two-dimensional (2-D) Cd II) coordination network [Cd AcO 2(L)2(H2O)] 1 (AcO = acetate, L = 4- 1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) benzoic acid ethyl ester) has been synthesized by low-temperature solid-state reaction and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, elemental analyses, IR spectra and UV–visible spectra.
Table 1 ACO parameter description Name Description Suggested value N Number of ants Number of nodes Q0 Probability of selecting exploitation over exploration 0.8 (alpha ) Aging factor used in the global updating rule 0.1 (beta ) Moderating factor for the cost measure function 2.0 (rho ) Aging factor in the local updating rule 0.1.
Such spots included adenine phosphoribosyl transferase 1 (APR1) (two spots), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase 1 (ACO 1) (two spots), major allergen Mal d 1 (two spots), superoxide dismutase [Cu Zn] (Cu/Zn-SOD) (two spots) and abscisic acid response protein (three spots).
And the up-regulated unigenes in ethylene signaling pathway were unigene 23152 (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase homolog 1, ACO), 40400 (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase, ACO), 20082 and 17548 (ethylene-overproduction protein 1), 24000 and 20993 (ethylene-insensitive protein 2), 6206 and 17574 (EIN3-binding F-box protein 1).
Fig. 1 ACO-OFDM VLC system model.
Based on the experimental structure of flagellin (1UCU.pdb), helical domains D0 and D1 have ACO at ∼3 while D2 has a value close to 10.
Meanwhile, the mRNA levels of FAS and GPAT were lower, but PPARα, CPT-1, ACO were higher in rats treated with genistein compared with HFS group.
ACCα, fatty acid synthetase (FAS), liver X receptor α (LXRα), SREBP1, ACO and FACS genes expression levels significantly (P < 0.05) increased with the increasing dietary biotin levels.
In Section 2, ACO and elitist ACO with MTSP approach are explained.
During the cognitive debriefing interviews, 15 (ACO: n = 7, COPD: n = 8) and 16 (ACO: n = 10, COPD: n = 6) patients stated that no concepts were missing from the EXACT and SGRQ instruments, respectively.
Table 7 Comparison of intelligent algorithms to solve optimal reconfiguration and capacitor placement problem in 33-bus system Used intelligent algorithm Power losses IBPSO 93.061 ACO [33] 95.79.
